Hermes
4a702a4fdb
Real-world numbers gathered from OSM (Overpass), Esri aerial imagery, and
frame-sampled onboard video. Replaces estimation with measurement.
Key findings:
* Loop radii MEASURED via Kasa circle fit on OSM ways: 27.5-204 m,
mean 131 m (469 studs). Two cleanest fits (rms<1.5) are the true
helixes at 147 m (525 studs) and 124 m (441 studs).
* 6 of 8 curved ramps turn CLOCKWISE - matches the video captions
'right, right and you will reach the PA'.
* FIVE deck layers in the interchange (OSM layer 1-5). Current
PA_LIFT=56 models only one; faithful build wants 3+ overhead.
* Real PA footprint 181x174 m (parking) / 203x227 m (rest_area).
Current APRON 210x200 m already matches well - the divergence is
SHAPE (square vs rounded wedge), not extent.
* Scale clarified: PA work uses M=3.571 studs/m, NOT the 4.3 in
c1_georeference.json (different mapping, 366 m median error).
Video reference archived to NAS 004-video-reference/ (364 MB, 4 routes).
161 lines
6.2 KiB
Markdown
161 lines
6.2 KiB
Markdown
# Daikoku Futo PA — Measured Reference Spec
|
||
|
||
Source-of-truth numbers for building the Daikoku PA entrance/exit ramps and
|
||
apron in `MapBuilder.luau`. Everything here is **measured**, not estimated:
|
||
OSM geometry via Overpass (`/tmp/osm_daikoku.py`), Esri aerial imagery, and
|
||
frame-sampled onboard video.
|
||
|
||
Generated 2026-08-03.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 1. Scale
|
||
|
||
| Quantity | Value |
|
||
|---|---|
|
||
| Project scale | `M = 1/0.28` = **3.571 studs per metre** (`MapBuilder.luau:69`) |
|
||
| Reciprocal | 1 stud = 0.28 m |
|
||
| `Circuit.STUDS_TO_KM` | 0.28 / 1000 |
|
||
|
||
> NOTE: `c1_georeference.json` records `scale_studs_per_meter: 4.3` for the C1
|
||
> loop georeference. That is a **different** mapping (real-Tokyo lat/lon → C1
|
||
> world) with a stated `median_error_m: 366`. Do **not** use 4.3 for PA
|
||
> geometry. PA work uses 3.571.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 2. The real PA footprint (OSM)
|
||
|
||
Overpass, bbox 35.4545/139.6700 → 35.4705/139.6935. ENU metres about
|
||
`35.46246657, 139.68149001` (user's Google Earth point).
|
||
|
||
| OSM way | Type | Extent (m) | Perimeter | Name |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| `405966005` | `highway=rest_area` | **203 × 227** | 646 m | 大黒PA |
|
||
| `59608205` | `amenity=parking` | **181 × 174** | 507 m | 大黒ふ頭パーキングエリア |
|
||
| `88702527` | `amenity=parking` | 102 × 107 | 359 m | (satellite lot, W of main) |
|
||
|
||
**Current build:** apron is `APRON_X = 210*M`, `APRON_Z = 200*M`
|
||
(`MapBuilder.luau:991`) = 210 × 200 m. That sits between the parking polygon
|
||
(181×174) and the rest_area polygon (203×227) — **already a good match.** The
|
||
apron extent is not the problem.
|
||
|
||
The *shape* is the divergence: the build is an axis-aligned square; the real
|
||
lot is a rounded wedge bounded on the N/E by the loop ramp arc.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 3. Loop ramp radii — MEASURED
|
||
|
||
Kasa circle fit over each OSM ramp way with |cumulative turn| ≥ 120°.
|
||
`rms` = fit residual (low = genuinely circular).
|
||
|
||
| OSM way | Length | Turn | **Radius** | rms | Layer | Direction |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| `32355896` | 475 m | −272° | **70.9 m** | 14.4 | — | CW / right |
|
||
| `32403901` | 601 m | −217° | **147.4 m** | **1.2** | 5 | CW / right |
|
||
| `32592491` | 729 m | +208° | **197.4 m** | 12.7 | 2 | CCW / left |
|
||
| `307397558` | 167 m | −178° | **27.5 m** | 9.0 | — | CW / right |
|
||
| `779045459` | 371 m | +161° | **123.6 m** | **0.7** | 3 | CCW / left |
|
||
| `32403902` | 656 m | −150° | **204.2 m** | 13.3 | 3 | CW / right |
|
||
| `32592481` | 359 m | −146° | **120.4 m** | 12.0 | 1 | CW / right |
|
||
| `32592487` | 488 m | −122° | **158.8 m** | 11.3 | 2 | CW / right |
|
||
|
||
**Headline numbers**
|
||
|
||
- Radius range **27.5 – 204 m**; mean **131 m** = **469 studs**
|
||
- The two cleanest circular fits (rms < 1.5) are the true helixes:
|
||
- `32403901` — **147 m** (526 studs), 217° of turn, layer 5
|
||
- `779045459` — **124 m** (441 studs), 161° of turn, layer 3
|
||
- **6 of 8 curve clockwise (right).** Matches the video captions exactly:
|
||
`右、右と覚えておくとPAに着きます` — "remember right, right".
|
||
|
||
**Recommended build values**
|
||
|
||
| Ramp | Radius (m) | Radius (studs) | Turn |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| Main entry helix | 147 | **525** | ~220° CW |
|
||
| Secondary helix | 124 | **440** | ~160° CCW |
|
||
| Tight connector | 71 | **255** | ~270° CW |
|
||
|
||
Current `Circuit.PA_RADIUS = 260` studs = 72.8 m — which is almost exactly the
|
||
tight connector (`32355896`, 70.9 m). The *main* helixes are roughly 2× that.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 4. Deck layers — the vertical stack
|
||
|
||
OSM `layer` tags on bridge ways in the interchange:
|
||
|
||
| Layer | Bridge ways | Total length |
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
||
| 1 | 11 | 17,696 m |
|
||
| 2 | 7 | 5,637 m |
|
||
| 3 | 8 | 5,368 m |
|
||
| 4 | 10 | 10,096 m |
|
||
| 5 | 6 | 1,417 m |
|
||
|
||
**Five distinct deck levels.** This is the single most important structural
|
||
fact: Daikoku JCT is a five-level stack, and the PA sits at the bottom of it.
|
||
|
||
Current `Circuit.PA_LIFT = 56` studs (15.7 m) of clearance over the apron —
|
||
that is one level. A faithful build wants at least 3 visible levels overhead.
|
||
|
||
Typical Japanese expressway deck-to-deck spacing is ~10–12 m; at 3.571 studs/m
|
||
that is **36–43 studs per level**.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 5. Video-derived detail
|
||
|
||
Sources archived at
|
||
`unraid-1:/mnt/user/data/yy-roblox-games/0-tokyo-wangan-racing/004-video-reference/`
|
||
|
||
| Route | Video ID | Len | Light | Value |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| CMT TOKYO "How to go to?" | `91suWmNr62c` | 2m50 | night | narrated turn-by-turn |
|
||
| Bay Bridge up (ベイブリッジ〜大黒PA) | `PK4BachUlYo` | 2m36 | night | full entry sequence |
|
||
| Yokohane down (横羽線下り) | `zlmdaR0opgE` | 5m15 | **day** | best structural read |
|
||
| Honmoku JCT (攻略車載#18) | `fNHucFnFQ1c` | 10m07 | **day** | approach + JCT |
|
||
| Night walkaround | `7i0-KCwMDyc` | 10m40 | night | apron-level atmosphere |
|
||
|
||
### Confirmed visual details
|
||
|
||
1. **Red/orange chevron shoulder paint** on the outer kerb through every ramp
|
||
curve. Present in all five videos, day and night. Highest-value cheap
|
||
detail available.
|
||
2. **White splayed / V-shaped piers** with trapezoidal box-girder deck
|
||
underside (clearest at `yokohane_down` t=218–242s).
|
||
3. **Chain-link mesh fencing** along ramp edges — not solid barrier. Above a
|
||
low concrete jersey base.
|
||
4. **Green route shields** `大黒線 K5`; blue circular regulatory signs;
|
||
`50` km/h limit discs on ramps.
|
||
5. **`/P` + up-right arrow gantry** marks the parking entry (`91suWmNr62c`
|
||
t=104s).
|
||
6. Apron at night: warm sodium pole lighting, **white stall lines clearly
|
||
visible**, painted directional arrows, low guardrail perimeter.
|
||
7. Arrival reads as **descending into a canyon** — decks close in overhead.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 6. Gaps / not yet measured
|
||
|
||
- **Deck heights above ground.** OSM `layer` gives ordering, not elevation.
|
||
Needs either a DEM lookup or estimation from video pier counts.
|
||
- **Third approach route.** Confirmed to exist (video states "3 ways"); two
|
||
are captured in full, the Honmoku run covers the approach only.
|
||
- **Exit ramp geometry.** All captured footage is *entry*. Exits not yet
|
||
sampled.
|
||
- **Stall grid angle.** Aerial shows a diagonal ~40–45° grid; exact bearing
|
||
not yet fitted.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 7. Reproduce
|
||
|
||
```bash
|
||
python3 /tmp/osm_daikoku.py # OSM geometry + circle fits
|
||
python3 /tmp/route.py <videoid> <name> <step_s> # video -> contact sheets
|
||
python3 /tmp/sat.py # Esri aerial tiles
|
||
```
|